Introduction

This page will briefly survey paleoecological records from sites with Choctaw cultural affiliation held by the Neotoma Paleoecology Database. This page was created by Nick Hoffman, as a project for the Ethical Open Science Research Coordination Network (EOS RCN).The leader of the EOS RCN is Jessica Blois, Professor at UC-Merced. If you would like to explore these records or other Neotoma data further, we are happy to help with that, so please reach out to either of us at or .

About Neotoma

Neotoma was formed in 2006 as a federated database constituted by a set of more specialized paleoecological databases. This means that Neotoma brings together paleoecological data from a range of proxy types (e.g., pollen, charcoal, testate amoebae), regions (e.g., North America, Latin America, Europe), and time periods (e.g., Pliocene, Pleistocene, Holocene). Neotoma incorporates data collected over more than 150 years.

Neotoma and Native Lands

Neotoma contains records from upwards of 22,000 sites. Many of these sites are affiliated with native lands. A subset of these sites comes from federally recognized reservations in the United States.

The following table counts the number of sites (n) from Neotoma that fall within the borders of federally recognized reservations. Overall, there are 692 sites on 105 reservations. The Chickasaw reservation has several Neotoma sites.

Neotoma Resources on the Chickasaw Reservation

The following map shows the location of Neotoma sites on the Chickasaw Reservation. There are (as of April 2024) 34 distinct sites, but some of them may be close together, so 34 dots are not necessarily distinguishable on the map.

And the following table lists some information about those sites.

We can further inspect the sites by the kinds of data they contain. Neotoma sites from the Chickasaw Reservation concern vertebrate fauna, macroinvertebrate, diatom and water chemistry.

Physical specimens are not typically preserved for all types of datasets, and Neotoma doesn’t have perfect information about the disposition of the physical specimens even when they do exist. What we do know is that for Neotoma data collected from the Chickasaw Reservation, the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma Archeological Survey hold physical specimens.

Other Neotoma resources with Chickasaw Cultural Affiliation

In addition to the Neotoma resources on the Chickasaw Reservation, we’ve used the Native Land API to filter for Neotoma sites on other lands with Chickasaw cultural affiliation. As of April 2024, there were no Neotoma resources on the Isle de Jean Charles but the other location with Chickasaw cultural affiliation does have Neotoma resources on it.

On these other lands with Chickasaw cultural affiliation (named Chickasaw (Oklahoma) and Chikashsha I̠yaakni’ (Chickasaw) on the native-land.ca website), there are 85 distinct sites with data on a range of proxy types. The repositories associated with the physical specimens for these datasets are more various compared to those on the Chickasaw Reservation.